Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision reddit. October 5: I submitted the revised manuscript.
Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision reddit. and they started us over with new reviewers.
Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision reddit But there are usually revisions to be made - sometimes major ones - and we also have to submit paperwork, so technically, you also have to wait for the paperwork to come through to be We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The editor requested major revisions due to comments from the reviewers. Other times it's because your view differs from a published view of a reviewer and the critiques are only, really, that you don't agree. I was wondering about the I agree, minor revisions are entirely writing errors, while major revisions requires data reinterpretation. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. However, today, Some journals have this weird category “reject with invitation to resubmit,” which functions as an alternative to “major revisions. You are free to resubmit an assignment within two weeks of your most recent exam attempt or at any point if you have an active college saver membership. October 25: The status What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted This stage is miserable, but continued revisions are good news! I had a major journal in my subfield give us 2-3 rounds of revisions at first. I have revised the manuscript two times: the first major revision and the second minor revision. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. I wouldn't worry just yet. Researchers have 21 days to approve submissions. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. I received that decision in February of that year, sent in my revisions quite quickly (2 weeks maybe?), and did not get reviews/a decision until September of that year. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". You said you recommended rejection twice now, and somewhat harshly because you perceived fatal flaws (that I assume you don't believe can be addressed in a revision). Hello everyone, so my research paper was reviewed with a request for 'major revision' (Q1 journal, related to biomedical engineering). After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Generally, the process flow for a revised manuscript is the same as that of a new submission. What does this mean? Meaning of change from Awaiting Reviewer Assignment to I submitted a paper to a journal that used scholarone and the reviewers recommended a major revision. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. Also, the statuses appeared very shortly after submission so I would be surprised if the reviewers had time to read and comment so fast. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. The rejection hurt, but I took the comments, modified what was too large of a paper into several smaller ones and have resubmitted the research to two different conference proceedings. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. Initially the status was "awaiting admin checklist", and then changed to The manuscript was sent back to the reviewers as it was a major revision. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. It got past the editor phase and switched to 'Reviewer Assignment Pending', being stuck in that ever since I've contacted the journal twice and got the same response, that it is still awaiting reviewers and that I'll be notified once an update happens. If they asked for major revisions, the review time would bring up their average time and make their journal less attractive. After I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again [email protected] Submitted my paper. It’ll take work and a second revision after this one most likely, but I’m confident we will get it done. If the RE thinks it is worthy, they assign reviewers. I have a hard time coming to the final decision, because I think the paper is lacking many important aspects, it tried to do two things at once, but none really. It seems like every paper assigned at least 3 reviewers. But in general, revise and resubmit with major revisions means that there are substantial changes that need to be made and you need to go to all possible lengths to satisfy the reviewers' comments. But for a minor revision, it's common for the editor to approve the revision without needing to bounce back to the original reviewers (it's also common to send back to the original reviewers, but if they aren't available, then the handling editor should be able to deal with this). It was incredibly rushed, so I'm discovering an accumulation of issues here and there as I re-read. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. July 1: I made the initial submission. It’s probably different between departments but Reddit. Would you submit to a journal with a median of 30 days for a decision, or a journal with a 120 days for a decision? Hi. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. A manuscript typically gets a desk review by the Editor-in-Chief. If you hover over the "Awaiting Review" you will see the date the study is to be approved by. The main statuses indicated are: New submission: The paper has been submitted successfully by the author and is waiting to be checked by the Managing Editor before being forwarded to the Editor. So, please give me I submitted a manuscript to a reputed Springer journal. But "minor revision" means "if you do the listed revisions, and they don't meaningfully change the content of the paper, it'll be accepted". We satisfied all requests from reviewers. So at the very least, this sounds unusual and worth querying. You were asked to revise the paper, based on the suggestions of the reviewers, and resubmit within 6-weeks. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. I feel disappointed because reviewer four doesn't think the work is good enough, I feel disappointed that I wasn't prepared for that and that my supervisor didn't prepare me better, I feel disappointed that all of the comments and revisions are in the first quarter of the dissertation, and that no one really had any comments about my research After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". I'm worried about getting major revisions, as opposed to minor, as a stipulation of the postdoc I've been shortlisted for is that I cannot have more than minor. This subreddit is a place where high income professionals of all types can ask, answer, discuss, and debate the personal finance and investing questions specific to our unique situations without being criticized, ostracized, or downvoted simply for This happened to my first attempt at publication. Post any questions you have, there are lots of redditors with admissions knowledge waiting to help. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. If you have to resubmit an assignment for a revision (be it ever so nitpicky), does the paper go to the end of the line again? The same, full-scoring line? Just finished the degree! 82 credits in 73 days, no prior work experience in the field of accounting . The iterative nature is part of the process. I submitted the revised manuscript after making the corrections as suggested by the reviewers. Outright acceptance of a journal paper is rare. Others take their time. I've added a few sentences and citations, according to the reader report, and I've deleted a couple of phrases they found confusing. ) I PERSONALLY would wait until the 3 month mark to do the nudge, especially since we're approaching holiday/end of semester season. August 12: The status changed to Under Review. With this one I have a feeling it I addressed a major revision status and an accept with revision status, now it has a new status "awaiting reviewer selection" Please explain. Settings Smart Goals and WOOPs are important as well. But it was finally accepted after more than a year! After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I sent 2 emails in the last 2 months asking about the update of the revised version. However, I just noticed that the status of my The article has been returned to reviewers after a major-revisions decision every time in my experience, both as an author and a reviewer. I typically get 2-3 rounds for an eventually-accepted submission, starting with major revisions, then down to minor revisions. Despite this, the comments were positive and the changes were My journal asks reviewers to return their work within 3 weeks. Or check it out in the app stores This is my second paper but the first time it was accepted after one revision and the comments weren't too bad. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I on the other hand, got an email saying I need to revise before I can even receive a passing grade. It's impossible to make a generalization across all journals and all specialties. Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have Once you've addressed the comments from the reviewers/editor, does it go back to the reviewers? Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Still this step is usually faster because the reviewers don't have to be "re-identified" (assuming they agree to review; otherwise it could take longer for a myriad of reasons). I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Ultimately, it took so long because even after finding reviewers one just decided to not review it After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I feel like the issues went over my supervisor's head, and the graders critiqued me quite harshly. As a reviewer, you are under no obligation to continue providing reviews. However, the editor has sent out another review invitation (#5 Reviewer). " Does it mean that my paper will go through After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 去年11月，我在老师的建议下投了一篇TMECH的文章，中间经过漫长的审稿、拒稿/大修，改稿、润色，最后到今天把大修的论文 They do this instead of major revisions at some journals because it makes their average review time look shorter. (To be sure, the kinds of minor revisions I've suggested may also be necessary as part of a broader slate of major revisions for an article. and they started us over with new reviewers. Most recent The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. This change has occurred Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now You can usually get things moving by sending a friendly follow up — I got one pushed through this way a month ago after it was “awaiting editor assignment” for 2 months. I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. If the recommendation for your initial submission was minor or major revision and you have carefully addressed all reviewer comments, there is a good chance that (1) Awaiting Admin Processing: 这是稿件顺利投出后的第一个状态，此时稿件由期刊秘书处理，如果稿件有问题，那么秘书会直接拒掉；如果形式审查没问题，秘书会将稿件送主编（Editor-in-chief，EIC）进一步处理。Awaiting Admin Processing状态持续时间一般不会超过2-3个 However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. I regularly do the reading before lectures as it is right now, but I'm having difficulty reviewing and rewriting In my field, "major revision" means do the work and we'll decide if it's good enough, including possibly sending to new reviewers, and there's a very good chance it could still be rejected. I requested that my professor review the assignments the day after, listing each step and the feedback the system gave me. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo It is possible. What to do when reviewer gives vague/confusing recommendations on a submitted math paper but didn't grade any of Lately I've been trying to get into the habit of consistently reviewing material on a daily basis instead of relying on cramming before tests. At the 1st and 2nd revision, I have revised the paper properly according to the reviewer's comments. ) Keep in mind that neither a major nor a minor revision are approving the paper as is. Get help with your research Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: After the first round of review I got major revisions request, which I did and after that I got publish with minor revisions. However, my supervisor told me several times when submitting papers that there's no such thing as minor revisions anymore and everyone seems to always say major just because they can. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. They had major revisions, reanalyzed the data per the reviewers’ request. One week after my defence and graduation, some of my classmates have received their grades. That's why I Major Revision is great news! Pretty much everybody in the labs that I work in has major/minor revisions. The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). This is the second round of revisions; two months ago, we received a “major revisions” decision with many detailed comments from the reviewers. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. We’re in a field where the specifics of how data were analyzed can make a huge difference to the conclusions. After three months I Usually reviewer 1 is fast and relatively positive,reviewer 2 is more thorough and takes more time (sometimes may be seen as harsher) and reviewer 3 is a mix bag, sometimes they just take forever to give basically no comments (must be putting it off) and accept, while others do not read the paper and reject because they think they have a better Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. If it passes it may be assigned to a subject matter expert Review Editor, who does another desk review. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but I recently submitted my first academic article for publication and received peer reviewer comments asking for a major revision. Usually, the journal's guidelines should state what has to be done for the major revision and how to report on it. The journal where I’m an AE got rid of the major revisions category a couple years back after a nasty fight with an author. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? I started at Raytheon 5 months ago, fresh graduate with a BSEE and some of my peers that were hired at the same time still don’t have assignments. ” I had this with one paper (Medical Care) and I think I had two of these rejections before the minor formatting revision pre-acceptance (longest submission process in my career; one year from first submission to acceptance). Humanities Anyone have insight as to why this might have happened? If it matters, this draft has already been through a revise & resubmit. I submitted it early in 2020 and received a 'major revisions' decision a few months later. Some journals show the under review status from the time the paper gets to the editor in chief through to the reviewers. It's not common for a paper to just get accepted or even accepted with minor revisions right off the bat. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. This change has occurred Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript I have submitted a revision to an elsevier journal after incorporating the suggestions from the reviewers. Second time major revision what should I do It is reviewer 2 again, the paper is submitted to high impact journal and after one year I got revision, I did this in less than one month middle of work required by my supervisor. After seven months I was asked by the editor to make major revisions. That said, it's very helpful if the same set of reviewers agree to review a revision. My question is how did it happen after minor revisions? From the start the 3rd reviewer was highly I just finished my PhD and got invited to be a reviewer for a paper submitted to the Royal Society of Chemistry. But, while the RE is deciding, the software I'm familiar with defaults to "Assigning reviewers". The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. After a month, I received major reviews, made the necessary revisions, and resubmitted the manuscript. I have submitted to a journal where "editor assignment pending" meant assignment of reviewers by the editor was pending, not that the assignment of an editor at all was pending. I got a nice “this isn’t up to our standards,” by the editor after two revisions. My paper underwent a revision. Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. Make it detailed. Your result is essentially major revisions 2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。 主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。一般在一周以内。看审稿人回复速度。 3、awaiting reviewer scores 等待审稿人审稿意见。 美陶 要求审稿人三周内给审稿意见。但 Some set up automatic approval so it is approved as soon as you submit the study. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. This change has occurred Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Article status went from Awaiting Decision back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores . Most recent answer. If this is the case for your submission, it will be shown in softconf by January 25th at the latest. September 4: The status changed to Reviews Completed. My personal definition of major-revisions as a reviewer is that I'm asking the author to do additional experiments or analysis, but if they do that work, the paper is suitable for publication. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. I come back and I've been on awaiting assignment since the new year started but still there doesn't seem to have been a place for me to be placed. (大修之后再送审，即要再经过审稿流程3－6) －reject and resubmit (论文现在状态不能接受，但可以修改后重新再投。要重新经过审 Copy the reviewer comments and answer each and every of them while also helpfully pointing out related changes to the manuscript. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo I just got a major revision request and the feedback seems pretty straightforward to address. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. Now, after that reviewer completed the review, that Spaced repetition is the only way to revise properly and you have to do it right after class. " I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Reddit. I remember the first time I got a major revision I sort of panicked too, but from my experience this is totally unnecessary! So congratulations, enjoy the moment and, go make that rebuttal! I submitted my manuscript on Oct 5 in a Springer Psychology journal. In the absense of such The reason is that reviewer#2 refers back to the same old comments that he gave at the major revision stage (He just copied and pasted alll the comments mentioned in the major revision stage It says “minor revisions”, but doesn’t explicitly say “accepted with minor revisions. When you resubmit, the “days in review” resets to zero. How View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit [D] AAAI 2021 Reviewer Assignment Notification but the Microsoft CMT page has already assigned 2 papers for Phase 2 on the reviewer page. I would like to know the paper rejection probability (very rough) after two round of major revision. They also Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. Get help with your research and later got a decision of major revision. My manager also told me that everyone on awaiting assignment needs to make a mandatory come back to the office and that's when I I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Having a routine is really good being on top of completing pre lecture or lab/tutorial work. Sometimes people really Posted by u/Mountain-Ad-4557 - 17 votes and 29 comments I'm preparing for my viva in about a month and re-reviewing my dissertation. 前段时间某trans的大修意见回来了，一共有6个审稿人，在major revision提交一段时间之后，状态先是awaiting reviewer scores，然后变成了awaiting AE recommendation，之后又马上变成了awaiting reviewer scores，有人知道是发生了什么吗 After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. I didnt see the "under review Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. This change has occurred －reconsideration after major revision. What do I do? So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. Generally, if you make the revisions as suggested, you will then be accepted. I eventually contacted the editor and received the accept decision not long after, but yeah, it After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. For minor revisions, some editors might make a decision on their After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. Back in July, I submitted a paper for Springer's Machine Learning. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which Reddit. Make sure you The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Also, You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Give yourself 10 days for papers. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have For example, minor revisions would not entail conducting a bunch of new analyses or overhauling part of the manuscript. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. I agree 100% - plus, it's so wrong that the reviewers (in my experience anyway) remain totally anonymous, but the author's identity is known (by the editor, obviously, but also by the reviewers, depending on the specialism and research topic - I am the only person in the world studying a particular topic, and a quick google reveals my name My leadership has spoken to everyone on awaiting assignment and people on the programs who would be affected by contracting/funding issues. However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author 有作者咨询：论文状态awaiting reviewer assignment 的意思，这是初审环节的一个状态，代表等待分配审稿专家，在整个sci论文发表过程中，论文状态会有多个变化，具体说明如下： 1、编辑初审阶段会看到的状态 Manuscript Submitted/Manuscript received by Editorial Office——投稿已到杂志社 My previous two publications were 1) accept with no revisions, and 2) accept with minor revisions, so major revisions are new to me, and I'm worried I haven't done quite enough. " Does this We once had a paper where reviewer 2 fully admitted to not reading the paper after a certain point, something about the science just being ‘no good’. But that gets extended because they sometimes wait to accept the invitation to review, which starts the clock. After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago The revise and resubmit nowadays is the equivalent to "major revision" from before: journals do this to report that the time from submission to publication is short, which helps their metrics and make them more attractive. Often, rather than reject a difficult manuscript outright, an editor will give the authors one chance to address the problems. In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! In my experience, the request for a second major set of revisions happens most often when you get a new reviewer, and most journals try to avoid that. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". You’re being congratulated because it means you make some revisions, resubmit and get accepted, rather than just outright being rejected. Reply reply Hardcandy_1982 • I have only got two reviews. Regarding your concern about having too much power, a single reviewer doesn't get to decide whether it's accepted. View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. You want to make the referee's and editor's job as easy as possible. I addressed every single comment of reviewers and made all the suggested changes. I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). Anyway, spent many more months improving the paper, taking the comments from my first attempt on board and ended up with what I thought was something pretty decent. This The title says it all. Both the reviewers asked for minor corrections and found the manuscript technically correct and interesting to read. Check out the sidebar for intro guides. awaiting reviewer assignment after revision技术、学习、经验文章掘金开发者社区搜索结果。掘金是一个帮助开发者成长的社区，awaiting reviewer assignment after revision技术文章由稀土上聚集的技术大牛和极客共同编辑为你筛选出最优质的干货，用户每天都可以在这里找到技术世界的头条内容，我们相信你也可以在 The phrase you may be looking for is "not sufficiently improved"; it's absolutely fine to downgrade your opinion after the revisions if they don't make the revisions you think are necessary, even if they make some of them. " This status has not been changed for a month. Unfortunately I have an asshole supervisor who is aggressive bully and not supportive. This change has occurred However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. Awaiting Reviewer After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. (大修之后再送审，即要再经过审稿流程3－6) in. Or check it out in the app stores Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. I'm facing some challenges with reviewer feedback on a recent paper submission. Specifically, Reviewer 2 provided very broad feedback, such as "Offer insights for overcoming implementation hurdles," without specific areas for improvement. September 15: I received a major revision decision. I submitted a review paper to a Springer-based journal. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. This change has occurred As both a reviewer and submitter I can offer this: Sometimes critiques are justified, in which case you revise and resubmit, saying as much as it hurts, valid comments much appreciated to help me get better. Maybe. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. Cite 3 Recommendations Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Did anyone encounter the same My journal submission status is still “awaiting reviewer selection” after nearly 3 months. The reviewer has raised a new issue in the 2nd revision and the reviewer has recommended me to revise the paper again. I got my project assignment 2 months after I had started. I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. Editors recommended major revisions and after another round of minor ones it was through. They consider either being with the editor or the reviewers [email protected] Submitted my paper. 6 months later the editor got back to me and decided to reject - I was gutted. After passing the initial check, it stayed with the "Reviewers Assigned" status until 12 Oct and went Under Review on 13 Oct. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". We did theseand got another round of reviewers. It's different for every journal. Journal paper major revisions Around last year I submitted my first ever paper manuscript to a journal. " Does this Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. All my transfer credits from pre-calc, trig, calc 1-2, physic 1, bio 1-2 , and chem 1-2 are not part of their engineering pathway here, but So the thing is, I have been looking quite often on the Elsevier tracking system and it seems that many reviewers were invited (2+), after 2 months and only 1 accepted to review. I would argue that they should focus on one thing and elaborate on that The paper is a 'revise and resubmit' (major revision) so I think it would only go back to the reviewers that already read it (max 3). What could be Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "awaiting recommendation", which was the status for about two weeks, and a few days ago it changed back to "awaiting referee scores". procession一般3－4天后就会安排主编。 2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。 Still waiting for a reply but I found this in the syllabus: If you are unsatisfied with your score, you will be able to revise and resubmit your assignments) twice. Thus, even if the same reviewers are assigned for reviewing your revised submission, the journal will follow the usual procedures, such as a preliminary check, sending out review invitations, etc. One reviewer was extremely negative saying that the paper was entirely based on speculation and that my understanding of the topic was superficial. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Colloquially we consider someone a PhD after they successfully defend, because they have completed the most major requirements of getting the doctoral degree. ” The reviewers left only one comment, and the editor said that the work was well received. Make sure to be the What, When and How in your calendar. " A major revision would normally go back to the same reviewers and they would usually have as much time to review as the original submission. This change has occurred It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. Major Revisions needed Minor revisions needed/weak accept Accept Strong Accept we are still awaiting a final review. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. I’ve also had the “here’s a major revision, but f*** you if you can actually complete the work” long shot type of major revisions. This change has occurred Second time major revision what should I do It is reviewer 2 again, the paper is submitted to high impact journal and after one year I got revision, I did this in less than one month middle of work required by my supervisor. If your paper's status is still "Awaiting Decision", your paper is accepted in Phase 1 and waiting for Phase 2 review. Does that mean one of the reviewer reject the paper after major revision or he excused that he couldn't revise it and if that yes how can the reviewing completed then. or does the editor might assign new reviewers to evaluate Reddit. After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. wanted to add I’m a transfer student getting a second degree in engineering. It's fairly uncommon, but mainly because the need for a second round of major revisions usually means that the authors haven't really addressed the problems that gave rise to the need for major revisions. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. Then after submiting the minor revisions and waiting for two months I got major revision request and I was shocked. Two of the three reviewer completed their reviews within a week whereas the third one has taken about 2 A major revision was submitted to a journal. I set up an appointment with a course instructor and hopefully that will clarify things for me. I'm very confused and this is the most difficulty I've ever had with an assignment. The manuscript was sent back to the reviewers as it was a major revision. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. 2 of my papers came back as major revisions but it took maybe 2 hours of The Reddit Law School Admissions Forum. October 5: I submitted the revised manuscript. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. After 22 days, the submission is automatically approved. The best place on Reddit for admissions advice. I have submitted a paper to an Elsevier journal and have already gone through 4 rounds of peer review and the editors have suggested a major revision each time. They are telling us to apply to other teams ASAP or risk the possibility of layoffs. I know how to make grammatically appropriate assignments? On my second attempt I put the textbook in my works cited list and it got sent back again for revision. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Two of the three reviewer completed their reviews within a week whereas the third one has taken about 2 months but still has not submitted his/her report which makes Or perhaps extremely major revisions and they need to find new reviewers if one refused to look at it again? (Or medium revisions and the reviewers just bounced for some other reason. Reviewer 1 says to accept with minor revisions, reviewer 2 awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。 主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。 －reconsideration after major revision. And it can definitely take 20 days to find three people willing to review a paper. However, the Under Review status changed to Reviewers Assigned on Oct 17 and again to Reviewers Assigned on Oct 19. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? This is typical for an accepted publication. The various status updates are as follows. I have already addressed 4 peer-reviewers, and in my last submission I addressed the comments of the 4th reviewer. Just a heads up to everyone. The other reviewer was kinder but did say that I needed to re-organise the paper and do more reading. This change has occurred the reason for my question is to understand what are the circumstances that make the editor change the status from completed to assigned. After double checking the Response to reviewers at major revision stage, we still believe that we have addressed reviewer#2 comments adequately (at least straightforward comments like putting the After submitting the revised version of my manuscript, it is showing "Editor assigned" for almost 3 months now. hgwljetpctoberttvyjxyvvajkmedcgazlhiyglxertbpabd